Legal Opinion

Nadeau v. Employment Security Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1990No. 8910SC110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

After being discharged by respondent employer, claimant filed for unemployment compensation benefits with the ESC effective 24 January 1988. Employer responded that claimant was disqualified because he was discharged for misconduct. An adjudicator of the ESC concluded on 12 February 1988 that claimant was not discharged because of misconduct or substantial fault connected with his work pursuant to G.S. sec. 96-14(2) or (2A). Employer appealed to the Appeals Referee, who, after a hearing, reversed the prior decision, and held that claimant was discharged for misconduct connected…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Leiphart v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Matter of EnochCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Mayhew Electric Co. v. CarrasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graves v. Culp, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Maraman v. Cooper Steel FabricatorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Maraman v. Cooper Steel FabricatorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API