Legal Opinion
Mario Valente Collezioni, Ltd. v. AAK LTD.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 2003No. 02 Civ. 0099(RPP)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendants AAK Limited and Maurice Ian Kindler (collectively, “Defendants”) move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Mario Valente Collezioni, Limited (“Plaintiff’) cross-moves for summary judgment on the issue of collateral estoppel pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is denied in part and granted in part and Plaintiffs cross-motion is denied in part and granted in part.
Background 1
In 1997, Plaintiff brought an action against Confezioni…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Bleeping Computer LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- De Curtis v. Ferrandina (In re Ferrandina)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Ananta Group, Ltd. v. Jones Apparel Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.