State v. Medina
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEGNER, Justice.
Following a jury trial, Jersson Neftaly Roque Medina (Medina) was convicted of trafficking heroin and conspiracy to violate the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. The charges were brought through two separate cases that arose out of the same set of facts. The two cases were consolidated and tried together. Medina now appeals his convictions, arguing that (1) fundamental error occurred when he appeared before the jury in chains; (2) fundamental error occurred when the jury instruction listing possible overt acts made in the furtherance of the conspiracy listed numerous acts…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Gomez-AlasIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. SaenzIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. PaulsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.