Legal Opinion
Piscioneri v. City of Ontario
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 2002No. E029472PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
The trial court granted a petition for writ of mandate which commands defendant City of Ontario (City) to immediately schedule a hearing on plaintiff’s applications for a disability retirement. The City appeals.
Facts
Mr. James Piscioneri was employed by the City as a firefighter from 1984 through 1987. On November 20, 1987, he filed an application for a disability retirement with the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS). PERS then notified the City to make a disability determination within six months, as required by former Government Code section 21025.1…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Farahani v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. PattersonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Blaser v. State Teachers' Retirement System, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- California School Employees Ass'n, Tustin Chapter No. 450 v. Tustin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.