Legal Opinion

Jenevein v. Friedman

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 8, 2003No. 05-02-01188-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justicé BRIDGES.

Appellant Terrie Jenevein asserts the trial court erred in granting summary judgment resulting in dismissal of her defamation suit against appellee Lawrence J. Friedman. She asserts that the trial court erred in granting Friedman sum mary judgment based on the “litigation privilege,” which is the privilege to make defamatory statements in the course of judicial proceedings. We reaffirm the principle that, for the litigation privilege to apply, the challenged defamatory statement must bear “some relation” to the subject matter of the underlying proceeding. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. James v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Senior Care Resources, Inc. v. OAC Senior Living, LLC Andrew Berry & Orson Berry, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  2. Ed & F Man Biofuels Ltd. v. Mv FaseDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  3. Star Tobacco, Inc. v. DarilekDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  4. Barefield v. DPIC Companies, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Barefield v. DPIC Companies, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API