Legal Opinion
Torruellas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided January 24, 1972No. Civil 138-69PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOLEDO, District Judge.
This cause is before this Court to determine the respective liabilities of the two codefendants’ insurance companies under the automobile insurance policies issued by them and involved in this cause.
Plaintiffs filed on February 26, 1969, a complaint against the Hartford Accident Indemnity Company and the National Fire Insurance Company, alleging that while coplaintiff Severo Torruellas, Jr. was a passenger in an automobile owned and driven by Roberto Matanzo, he suffered injuries when said automobile was struck from behind by a car owned by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- American Surety Company of New York, and Cross-Appellee v. Canal Insurance Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, a Corporation v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Group, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Priester v. Vigilant Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Pierluisi v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1977