Legal Opinion
Wright v. Schock
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 30, 1983No. C-81-4127 RFPPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PECKHAM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Henry and Helen Wright brought this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated alleging violations of federal and state securities laws and common law fraud in connection with their purchase of promissory notes secured by deeds of trust on real property, offered to them by an entity known as Golden State Home Loans (“GSHL”). They have named as defendants Darrell Schock, the President of GSHL and his wife, Jean Schock, the sole shareholders of GSHL; some 63 other individuals bearing various relationships to the acts…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Wright v. SchockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- National Union Fire Insurance v. DeloachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.