In Re the Foreclosure of Norton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The trial court found as fact that
9. Notice has been given to all those parties entitled thereto under the terms of Article 2A, Chapter 45 of the North Carolina General Statutes, specifically including the record owner of the real estate, namely R. Woodrow Norton, Jr., and the court further finds that no other party claiming to be the record owner has intervened in this action or has caused any collateral action to be filed asserting their ownership thereto and that there was no evidence offered by R. Woodrow Norton, Jr., that there is any other record owner of the real estate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brandon v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Creasman v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'NSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Smathers v. . JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacOn-atlanta State Bank v. GallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re Foreclosure of Real PropertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Riverpointe Homeowners Association v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Louis v. ShrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015