Legal Opinion
Brosten v. Scheeler
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 11, 1973No. 73 C 592PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on the defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint and the amendment to the complaint.
This is an action to redress the alleged deprivation of the plaintiff’s civil rights as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and protected by 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343.
The plaintiff, Hy Brosten, is a property owner in Park City, Illinois and since December 3, 1957, prior to the date of incorporation of Park City, the plaintiff has operated his business of selling…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Collins v. HardymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re NVR L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Oaks v. City of Fairhope, Ala.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1981
- Ligon v. State of Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- Collins v. BensingerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Brosten v. ScheelerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.