Peterson v. Stanczak
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Motions of Defendants to Dismiss
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
This is an action seeking damages resulting from a deprivation of civil rights, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a conspiracy to obstruct justice and deprive plaintiff of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2), (3). Plaintiff and all defendants except Donald Nystrom currently reside in Illinois. Federal jurisdiction is properly predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Defendants, in various combinations, have made a series of motions to *428dismiss. Essentially, all defendants suggest that the complaint fails to state a valid cause…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Collins v. HardymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ames v. VavreckDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
- Harley v. OliverDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1975
- Balistrieri v. WarrenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- Maniaci v. WarrenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- DeGroot v. MuccioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.