Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Stanczak

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 28, 1969No. 68 C 1587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Motions of Defendants to Dismiss

MAROVITZ, District Judge.

This is an action seeking damages resulting from a deprivation of civil rights, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a conspiracy to obstruct justice and deprive plaintiff of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2), (3). Plaintiff and all defendants except Donald Nystrom currently reside in Illinois. Federal jurisdiction is properly predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Defendants, in various combinations, have made a series of motions to *428dismiss. Essentially, all defendants suggest that the complaint fails to state a valid cause…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  5. Collins v. HardymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ames v. VavreckDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  2. Harley v. OliverDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1975
  3. Balistrieri v. WarrenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1970
  4. Maniaci v. WarrenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1970
  5. DeGroot v. MuccioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API