Legal Opinion

Murawski v. CNA Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 6, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

874 A.2d 530 (2005)

183 N.J. 423

Thomas MURAWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 27, 2004.

Decided June 6, 2005.

Robert G. Goodman, Woodbridge, argued the cause for appellant (Palmisano & Goodman, attorneys; John T. Brost, Carteret, on the briefs).

Jerald J. Howarth, Parsippany, argued the cause for respondent CNA Insurance Company (Hahn & Howarth, attorneys).

Gerald H. Baker, Hoboken, argued the cause for amicus curiae, Association of Trial Lawyers of America-New Jersey (Baker, Garber, Duffy & Pedersen, attorneys).

2Per curiam

This…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pinto v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Botti v. CNA Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Murawski v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API