Murawski v. CNA Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
874 A.2d 530 (2005)
183 N.J. 423
Thomas MURAWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 27, 2004.
Decided June 6, 2005.
Robert G. Goodman, Woodbridge, argued the cause for appellant (Palmisano & Goodman, attorneys; John T. Brost, Carteret, on the briefs).
Jerald J. Howarth, Parsippany, argued the cause for respondent CNA Insurance Company (Hahn & Howarth, attorneys).
Gerald H. Baker, Hoboken, argued the cause for amicus curiae, Association of Trial Lawyers of America-New Jersey (Baker, Garber, Duffy & Pedersen, attorneys).
2Per curiam
This…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Pinto v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Botti v. CNA Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Murawski v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005