Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 15, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Having been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for three years upon a charge of grand larceny, Lawrence Harvey appeals and contends: (1) that he was entitled to a peremptory instruction of acquittal; (2) that the trial court unduly restricted his right of cross-examination of witnesses; (3) that the court made improper comments in the presence of the jury; and (4) that the instructions and forms of verdicts submitted to the jury were erroneous.

According to the evidence for the Commonwealth, Lawrence Harvey and Benjamin Jack Anderson were seen carrying a television set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merritt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  2. Duroff & Duke v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. Eaves v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Hunt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blair v. Kentucky; And Carpenter Et Al. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Blair v. Kentucky; And Carpenter Et Al. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Richard Carpenter, Stephen Borders, (81-5179), Jerome C. Blair, (81-5516) v. Charles M. Leibson, (81-5179 & 81-5516)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Richard Carpenter, Stephen Borders, (81-5179), Jerome C. Blair, (81-5516) v. Charles M. Leibson, (81-5179 & 81-5516)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API