Legal Opinion
State v. Carlson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 29, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
782 A.2d 950 (2001)
344 N.J. Super. 521
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Terrance CARLSON and Jeanette Leehr, Defendants-Respondents.
Irving D. Isko, Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued telephonically September 21, 2001.
Decided October 29, 2001.
David Schechner, West Orange, argued the cause for appellant Irving D. Isko (Schechner & Targan, attorneys; Mr. Schechner, on the brief).
David L. Epstein, Roseland, argued the cause for respondents Terrance Carlson and Jeanette Leehr (Post, Polak, Goodsell & MacNeill, attorneys; Mr. Epstein, of counsel; Mr. Epstein…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GodshalkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- State v. VitielloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Isko v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MAYOR DWAYNE D. WARREN, ESQ. (2017-017, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- WARD v. BOROUGH OF BEACH HAVENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022