Legal Opinion

United States v. Antonio McKay Reginald Housley

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 2, 1994No. 91-4200PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

While defendants challenge their convictions on many fronts, defendant McKay argues mainly that his conviction violated the time restrictions set forth in the Speedy Trial Act (the “Act”). We affirm.

I

Defendants Housley and McKay were first indicted in February 1991. The indictment charged defendants with conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, possession with intent to distribute, and using a firearm in a drug trafficking crime. In April 1991, at a status conference held before magistrate Judge Jenkins, the government announced that it would seek a superseding indictment and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Otis Vasser, Jr., Leon PageCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Martin RomanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Timothy N. Van SomerenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Michael KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy MacK WEST, A.K.A. Teeny Man, Etc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API