Legal Opinion
Farina v. Compuware Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 31, 2003No. CV-98-722-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are three summary judgment motions and one motion for leave to file an amended complaint. On February 8, 2002, Defendant Compu- ware Corporation (“Defendant” or “Com-puware”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Title VII Claims (Doc. # 143). On May 17, 2002, the parties each filed motions on Plaintiff Jocelyn Farina’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Farina”) claims under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”): Plaintiff filed Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on Count VII of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 167) and Defendant filed…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Downey v. StrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Mondaine v. American Drug Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Kluczyk v. Tropicana ProductsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- James v. Dependency Legal GroupDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Smith v. Blue Dot Services CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.