Legal Opinion

Morehouse v. Pacific Hardware & Steel Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1910No. 1,744PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Petition to Review Proceedings of the District Court of the United Stat.es for the District of Nevada, in Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings against the Exploration Mercantile Company, instituted by the Pacific Hardware & Steel Company and others, petitioning creditors, in which an injunction >vas issued against the bankrupt and others.

Read the full summary

Petition to Review Proceedings of the District Court of the United Stat.es for the District of Nevada, in Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings against the Exploration Mercantile Company, instituted by the Pacific Hardware & Steel Company and others, petitioning creditors, in which an injunction >vas issued against the bankrupt and others. An order was therea'ftef granted requiring petitioners to show cause why they should npt be adjudged guilty of contempt for disobeying the injunction, and petitioners filed a petition .to review. 'This is a petition to review an order in…

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as aboye). The respondents move to dismiss the petition on several- groupds, only one of which need be considered; and that is, that the matter .complained .of is not reviewable until the petitioners shall have been adjudged guilty of contempt in the court below. If the order which' is 'com*339plained of were conceded to be an order in a bankruptcy proceeding proper, and of the class of proceedings which are made subject to the supervisory control of this court, it would seem, nevertheless, that it is not reviewable on petition for the reason that it is not an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re Saco Local Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Columbia Foundry Co. v. LochnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. In Re Manufacturers Trading Corp. Kiersted v. Hadden (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. Diamond Door Co. v. Lane-Stanton Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. In the Matter of Gilhuly's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API