Legal Opinion

Rickli v. Autzen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiffs brought an action based on the theory of restitution, claiming that defendants were unjustly enriched by money paid by plaintiffs to a third party under a mistake of fact. A demurrer was sustained to plaintiffs’ complaint and plaintiffs appealed from a judgment dismissing their complaint which was entered when they refused to plead further.

The complaint states that defendants were the owners of all the stock in a corporation called Western Manufacturing Company. They offered the stock to two individuals, Dutton and Scheidt, for the sum of $500,000, payable $75,000 down and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Menefee v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Disposal Technology, Inc. v. EhrlichOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Handy v. BeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Metal Tech Corp. v. Metal Teckniques Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. American Nat. Bank of Denver v. TonkinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Carpenter v. EgliOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Portland General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API