Heuser v. Crum

It is clear that appellants were barred from presenting claims against the assets of the estate of Wetzel Crum.1 They did not “present their claims to the * * * administrator * * * within four months after the date *92of the appointment of the * * * administrator * * V’ pursuant to R. C. 2117.06, or within the nine-month time then specified in R. C. 2117.07. See, Fortelka v. Meifert (1964), 176 Ohio St. 476, 200 N. E. 2d 318; Beach v. Mizner (1936), 131 Ohio St. 481, 3 N. E. 2d 417. Likewise, they were precluded by the terms of R. C. 3929.06 from instituting any action directly against the…