Klugh v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 149, Oct. T., 1905, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 1, sustaining exceptions to taxation of costs in case of William F. Klugh v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Exceptions to taxation of costs. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam,
The record shows that the case was settled, defendant to pay costs ; that pursuant to rule upon the defendant the costs were taxed by the prothonotary, the counsel for both parties being present at the taxation; that the defendant appealed to the common pleas from the prothonotary’s taxation, and filed specifications of the items objected to, some of which exceptions raised questions of fact; that after hearing, the court filed the following opinion and order: “ In accordance with the views expressed in the case of Jacob Beach v. The -Pennsylvania Railroad, the costs of subpoenaing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartley v. WeidemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Kottcamp v. York CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967