Legal Opinion

Hartman v. University of Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 16, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAIN, Judge.

For the second time, the claimants appeal a decision of the Tennessee Claims Commission denying them recovery from the University of Tennessee and the State of Tennessee of $1,026,666 in medical expenses allegedly paid by BellSouth Corporation under an ERISA plan with BellSouth alleged to be subrogee of such payments.

The claimant Scott Hartman is the son of the claimants Kay Hartman and Cleon Hartman. On April 17, 1987, Scott Hartman was permanently and catastrophically *571injured while participating in a track meet under a student athlete scholarship at the University of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United Healthcare Corporation v. American Trade Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott Hartman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API