Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. J. J. CURTIS. Tom Howard was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Omitting formal charging part, the affidavit is as follows: That within twelve months before the making of this affidavit Tom Howard sold, offered for sale, or kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of, spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, contrary to law.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. J. J. CURTIS. Tom Howard was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Omitting formal charging part, the affidavit is as follows: That within twelve months before the making of this affidavit Tom Howard sold, offered for sale, or kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of, spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, contrary to law. (4) Within twelve months before making this affidavit and since January 27, 1915, Tom Howard received or accepted for delivery of or possessed at one time more than one-half gallon of spirituous…

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Tom Howard was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Omitting formal charging part, the affidavit is as follows:

That within twelve months before the making of this affidavit Tom Howard sold, offered for sale, or kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of, spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, contrary to law.(4) Within twelve months before making this affidavit and since January 27, 1915, Tom Howard received or accepted for delivery of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Cook v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oldacre v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Moragne v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Landers v. MooreAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API