Legal Opinion

Brotko Ex Rel. Brotko v. United States

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided December 7, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-0006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAGUEUX, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant, United States of America, for summary judgment and the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.

Gail and Mark Brotko initiated this action individually and as next friends of their daughter, Jillian Brotko, after she received injuries from a dog bite. The Brotkos and the dog’s owner, Brian Martinez, resided in housing owned and leased to them by the U.S. Navy. The Brotkos base their claims on the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), charging the government with responsibility for…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Laird v. NelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sargent v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sharon Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Weaver v. United States Coast GuardDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
  3. Gray v. DerderianDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
  4. Stanley v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  5. Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API