Legal Opinion

Marschall v. Eisen Vineyard Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 2, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by August MarschaU and others against the Eisen Vineyard Company for damages for breach of contract. From a judgment of the city court (21 N. Y. Supp. 468) affirming a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

The action is for damages for breach of an executory contract to sell a car load of sherry. The answer denies the contract; and whether there was a valid contract is the question for decision. To the validity of the contract, a memorandum of its terms was requisite under the statute of frauds; and such memorandum, the plaintiffs contend, is furnished by the following series of telegrams between the parties: On June 27th, the plaintiffs,, in New York, wired the defendants, in San Francisco: “Will you ship us one or two carloads of sherry?” On June 28th, the defendants answered: “Can furnish…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cobb v. DunlevieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Holberg v. Westchester Racing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Farmers' State Bank of Mineola v. MincherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Hughes v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  5. Sidney Glass Works v. A. S. Barnes & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API