Legal Opinion

Gillen v. Reynolds Metals Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 16, 1943No. Civil Action No. 225PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs ask damages1 for contributory infringement of Claim 1 of their patent No. 2,018,061, issued October 22, 1935. The claim relates to the combination of a particular type of transparent pouring lip closure with a “relatively heavy” glass wall milk bottle. Not a milk bottler, defendant did not itself use the combination. However, it is contended and substantially conceded that defendant did manufacture bottle hoods of the type used in the combination, so that it is guilty of contributory infringement if plaintiffs’ patent is valid.

Claim 1 claims a combination. It…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Rowell v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berghane v. Radio Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API