Legal Opinion

Miller v. . Campbell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ceoss-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered September 30, 1916, affirming a judgment entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and also dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim. Plaintiff as attorney-in-fact assumed to sell some lands in Tennessee to defendants’ testator.

Read the full summary

Ceoss-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered September 30, 1916, affirming a judgment entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and also dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim. Plaintiff as attorney-in-fact assumed to sell some lands in Tennessee to defendants’ testator. Under the power of attorney, as was known to defendant’s testator, plaintiff, was to receive the full purchase price in excess of $10,000. The defendants paid what was equivalent to $10,000…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saale v. Interstate Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. South Shore Securities Co. v. GoodeNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Galloway v. WolfeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API