Alice v. Prokop and Harry W. Prokop. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Alice v. Prokop
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WHAM, District Judge.
The petitioners, Harry W. Prokop and Alice V. Prokop, are husband and wife and were at all times pertinent to this case. For the year 1944 they made a joint income tax return and this is the sole involvement of Harry W. Prokop in these proceedings. For the years 1945, 1946, and 1947 they made individual returns and those years affect Mrs. Prokop only. In their respective returns the income so reported by each was the *546salary earned in their respective employments — Mr. Prokop as a salaried social worker and Mrs. Prokop as a salaried employee of Local No. 494, International…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Otsuki v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Estate of Beck v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Federbush v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Estate of Upshaw v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.