Legal Opinion

Eliason State Bank v. Montevideo Baseball Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1924No. 24,229PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This action was brought against the Montevideo Baseball Association on a promissory note for the sum of $1,800. It was evidently brought under section 7689, G. S. 1913, which in part reads:

“When two or more persons transact business as associates and under a common name * * * they may be sued by such common name.”

The complaint alleged that a large number of persons named therein and others to the plaintiff unknown had associated themselves together under the name “Montevideo Baseball Association.” *342The note was signed:

“Montevideo -Baseball Association
“By Emmet E. Olson, President
“By…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newport v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. I. W. Phillips & Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Bryce Et Ux. v. BullSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Foster v. FeatherstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Johnson v. GraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API