Eliason State Bank v. Montevideo Baseball Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This action was brought against the Montevideo Baseball Association on a promissory note for the sum of $1,800. It was evidently brought under section 7689, G. S. 1913, which in part reads:
“When two or more persons transact business as associates and under a common name * * * they may be sued by such common name.”
The complaint alleged that a large number of persons named therein and others to the plaintiff unknown had associated themselves together under the name “Montevideo Baseball Association.” *342The note was signed:
“Montevideo -Baseball Association
“By Emmet E. Olson, President
“By…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Newport v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- I. W. Phillips & Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Bryce Et Ux. v. BullSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Foster v. FeatherstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Johnson v. GraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.