Legal Opinion

State v. A.N.W. Seed Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 12, 1986No. 7272-0-III; 7362-9-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, C.J.

The sole question presented is whether the court abused its discretion by denying defendants' motion to vacate a default judgment. We reverse.

The State commenced this action against the Kilthaus alleging violations of the Consumer Protection Act based on alleged misrepresentations with regard to the growing and marketing of Jerusalem and American artichokes. The alleged misrepresentations were made in oral and written advertising and other promotional materials. The State sought damages on behalf of the alleged injured farmers and a permanent injunction as to each misrepresentation. After…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Widicus v. Southwestern Electric Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. C. Rhyne & Associates v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hardesty v. StencheverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Vaughn v. ChungWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ANW Seed CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mosbrucker v. Greenfield Implement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. State v. A.N.W. Seed Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API