Legal Opinion
Dioquino v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 12, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00167Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 JONI DIOQUINO, Case No. 20-cv-00167-BAS-RBB 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 14 AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 15 v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 22) 16 UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiff Joni Dioquino brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income 20 Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). She seeks disability benefits under two employee benefit 21 plans funded by Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. Now before the 22 Court is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.