Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leonard G. Adent

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2016No. 2015AP002032-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 between the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Leonard G. Adent. In the stipulation, Attorney Adent agrees with the OLR's position that his misconduct warrants the imposition of a public reprimand. Attorney Adent also agrees with the OLR's position that various conditions be imposed upon his continued practice of law in Wisconsin.

¶ 2. After fully reviewing the stipulation and the facts of this matter, we accept the stipulation and impose the public reprimand jointly requested by the parties. We further find it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. LeSieurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Janet L. HeinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Dennis A. Teague v. Brad D. SchimelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leonard G. AdentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API