Legal Opinion

King v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 6, 1998No. 97-3510Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

HARRIS, Judge.

Herbert Wilson King has moved for rehearing and clarification of our previous per curiam affirmed opinion. We grant his request.

In 1995, King was charged with violations of section 794.01, Florida Statutes, which were alleged to have occurred in 1970 and 1972. Although the statute was repealed in 1974, the trial court held that King should be prosecuted under the statute as it existed on the date of the offenses. We agree and affirm.

Article X, Section 9 of the Florida Constitution provides that “Repeal or amendment of a criminal statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pensacola & Atlantic Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Plummer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  3. Tooley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API