Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 14, 2011No. 4916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

Stacy Howard appeals his conviction of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). Howard argues the trial court misapplied the Colf 1 factors when weighing the probative value and prejudicial impact of admitting his prior ABHAN convictions. We reverse and remand.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 29, 2007, a Georgetown County jury found Howard guilty of ABHAN. At trial, Howard’s former girlfriend testified he struck her during an argument in his truck. The victim’s nose was broken in three places, and she underwent surgery for her injury. The victim initially lied and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. ByersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. ColfSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Vaught v. A.O. Hardee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Howard v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. BroadnaxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API