Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 1915No. 6392PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Indictment for sale of liquor; from Whitfield superior court— Judge Fite. January 27, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

1. “When-alibi is the only defense set up by a defendant in a criminal ease, and this defense is sustained by testimony, the jury should be properly instructed in the rules governing the consideration of the subject of alibi, even in the absence of a request, and although the defense of alibi is included in the general plea of ‘not guilty.’ It is the duty of the court to instruct the jury, without request, in the law applicable to the substantial issues presented by the evidence.” Hobbs v. State, 8 Ga. App. 53 (3), 54 (68 S. E. 515).(a) The defendant sought to establish an alibi. The court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Bone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Hobbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hornsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Mosley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Tiller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API