Legal Opinion

Shulman, Goetter & Weil v. Brantley & Copeland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. J. McCaleb Wiley.

1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Saffold, J.

The appellants sued the appellees on an open account, and issue was joined, on the pleas of non assumpsit and payment. The evidence tended to prove and *82to disprove payment. The court refused to give the following charge, asked by the plaintiffs in writing: “If the jury are reasonably satisfied, from the evidence, that the account sued upon is correct, then the burden is on the defendants to prove payment, if they rely on that plea; and they are authorized to look to all of the evidence on this point, and if it is evenly balanced between the plaintiffs and the defendants, they must find for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. LillieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  2. Lindsey v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  3. Harris v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. McFarland v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. McFarland v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API