Legal Opinion

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. East Delta Resources Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 14, 2014No. 12-5079-cvPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Mayer and David Amsel, proceeding pro se, appeal the district court’s judgment for the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), finding them liable for fraud in violation of § 17(a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), § 10(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and SEC Rule 10b-5,17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; and registration improprieties in violation of § 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77e(a) and (c). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.1

We affirm the district…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CKB168 Holdings, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. BlackburnDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API