Legal Opinion

Paul E. v. Courtney F.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2019No. CV-18-0111-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court:

¶1 When a family court designates one parent as the sole legal decision-maker for a child, unless the parties agree otherwise, the court may limit the decision-maker's authority only as necessary to prevent endangering the child's physical health or significantly impairing the child's emotional development. See A.R.S. § 25-410(A). We consider whether the family court exceeded its statutory authority by appointing specific treatment professionals for the child here and otherwise limiting the parent's sole legal decision-making authority. We hold that it did.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Robert J Nicaise Jr v. Aparna SundaramArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Susan Ryan v. napier/kleinArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  5. North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. SantanaArizona Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jorgenson v. GiannecchiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  2. NEELEY v. THOMASCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API