Commonwealth v. Kratzer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the constitutional provisions prohibiting double jeopardy prevent the imposition of consecutive sentences on remand where the original sentences were concurrent, even though the aggregate sentence is reduced on remand. Because we find no constitutional violation, we affirm.
In October 1990, Kratzer was arrested and charged with five separate offenses involving the unlawful delivery of cocaine. Three of the charges were filed in Lehigh County, and the remaining two charges were filed in Northampton County. Kratzer entered into a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SuttonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. HermankevichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BartrugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ByrneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. JamesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. ArestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.