Legal Opinion

Reimer v. Naughton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Joseph Naughton and another, from a judgment of the County Court of the county of Queens in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant Earl A. Gillespie, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 21st day of December, 1918, upon the decision of the court after a trial without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, J.:

The record presented to the court upon this appeal is very unsatisfactory, but we must dispose of the case upon that record. It contains the complaint and the answers of the defendant Giblin and the defendant, respondent, Gillespie, another lienor. There is no answer of the defendant, appellant, Naughton. It is alleged in the complaint, and found by the trial judge, that the defendant Giblin is the record owner of the property, although in her answer she denies the allegation of the complaint that she was the owner. We are bound on this appeal by the finding so made. She was a woman…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martens v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. In re GablerNew York Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. C. M. McLean & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Kraft v. Fisk Associates (In Re Millerlee Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Johnson v. Waldo Griffiths, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Meszaros v. IndiveriNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. O'Neill v. Seglin Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API