Harpold v. Slocum
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank E. Willis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This case is within the appellate jurisdiction of the district court of appeal. Appeals were regularly taken to the district court of appeal of the second district by the defendants from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. Thereafter a document was filed in that court purporting to be a transcript on appeal and which the appellants claim is sufficient in that respect. Upon motion of the respondent the district court dismissed the appeal, holding that the document so filed did not constitute a transcript on appeal, and that no sufficient transcript had been filed within the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knoch v. HaizlipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Ramsay v. RodgersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Clemens v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Benson v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Koeberle v. CoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.