Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Day

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2015No. 14-6050, 14-6051PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs are five women who were formerly incarcerated at the Hillside Community Corrections Center (“Hillside”) in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. They filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against multiple defendants, alleging they were sexually abused and harassed in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiffs’ complaint named fifteen defendants, including Defendant-Appellant Charlotte Day and Defendant-Appellant Mary Pav-liska, both of whom were guards at Hillside during the relevant period. Plaintiffs alleged…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Cox v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Perry v. DurborowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Brown v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Patel v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. Henderson v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API