Prioleau v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BARBERA, Judge.
We consider in this appeal whether the phrase “What’s up, Maurice?,” when uttered by a police officer to an arrestee, is interrogation or its functional equivalent as those terms are understood in the parlance of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and its progeny. For the reasons that follow, we hold that words “What’s up, Maurice?” were merely a greeting, given the circumstances in which they were spoken. The officer’s words did not constitute formal interrogation, nor were they spoken under circumstances that the officer should have known…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prioleau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Adams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010