Legal Opinion

Palermo v. Eagle Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 4, 2024No. 2:23-cv-05425Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BRENDA PALERMO, et al. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-5425 * VERSUS * SECTION: “O”(1) * EAGLE INC., ET AL. * JUDGE BRANDON S. LONG * * MAGISTRATE JUDGE * JANIS VAN MEERVELD *********************************** * ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is the Motion to Quash filed by defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (“Avondale”). (Rec. Doc. 68). Balancing the need for relevant information against the privacy interests implicated by the subpoenaed documents, the Motion to Quash shall be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: The scope of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API