Harris v. State

The appellant, Melvin Junior Harris, contends on this appeal that the lower court erred:

I in denying a motion to dismiss the indictments ;

II in proceeding to trial of the general issue when the appellant made known his desire to appeal preliminarily from the judgment on the motion to dismiss;

III in not determining the admissibility of evidence as to his identification at a lineup prior to trial of the general issue;

IV in the admission of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure;

V in rendering verdicts of guilty when the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the convictions.

HIST…