Legal Opinion

Pacific Pipeline Construction Co. v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1958No. L. A. 24146PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in an action for a refund of certain sales taxes, interest and penalties paid under protest, after trial before the court without a jury.

Although other issues were tried in the action, the sole question presented on this appeal is whether plaintiff is required to pay a sales tax with respect to a certain transfer to Pacific Pipeline & Engineers, Ltd., by plaintiff on March 14, 1949, of machinery and equipment valued at $201,230.50. *731Defendant determined that plaintiff was required to pay a tax of $6,491.78.

Prior to February 24,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Market Street Railway Co. v. Calalifornia State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Los Angeles City High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Sutter Packing Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bank of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Gibbons & Reed Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Besser Company v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Jones-Hamilton Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API