Legal Opinion

Keeling v. Huber & Huber Motor Express, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided June 8, 1944No. 632PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

This action was brought by the plaintiff James K. Keeling, on behalf of himself and six other employees of the defendant, Huber and Huber Motor Express, Inc., to recover overtime compensation, damages and attorneys’ fees under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Following a pre-trial hearing plaintiff and defendant have entered into a tentative stipulation of facts for the purpose of securing a ruling on a motion by the defendant to dismiss. If the ruling is adverse to the defendant, the case will proceed to trial with the stipulation eliminated.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Southland Gasoline Co. v. BayleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Hutchinson v. William C. Barry, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
  4. Anuchick v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
  5. Walling v. Silver Bros.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walling v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  2. Tobin v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1951
  3. Osorio v. Mathews Prime Meats, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  4. Walling v. Silver Fleet Motor Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1946
  5. Say v. the Prior Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API