Legal Opinion

Say v. the Prior Oil Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1945No. Appeal, 119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit under the “Pair Labor Standards Act of 1938,” 52 Stat. 1060, 29 IJ.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover from defendant overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney fees. See 29 U.S.C.A. § 218. The trial resulted in a directed verdict in favor of defendant on the grounds that defendant was engaged in interstate commerce, and that plaintiff’s employment by defendant came within the exemption contained in section 13 (b) (1) of the act, 29 U.S.C.A. §213 (b) (1). Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled, and from the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Southland Gasoline Co. v. BayleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of New York v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Vernon v. Firemen's Pension FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API