Legal Opinion

Dutton v. Southern Pacific Transportation

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1978No. B-7463PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL, Justice.

The principal question on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in giving the common law definition of “proximate cause” in a personal injury suit filed pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and the Safety Appliance Act. 1 In affirming the trial court, the Court of Civil Appeals held that inclusion of the common law definition of proximate cause along with an F.E.L.A. definition was not erroneous. 561 S.W.2d 892. We disagree and reverse and remand the case to the trial court.

The plaintiff, Wesley T. Dutton, a brakeman for the defendant railroad company,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Brown v. Western R. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wernsing v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Gaulden v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Houghton v. Port Terminal RR Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API