Legal Opinion
Dorset Industries, Inc. v. Unified Grocers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 27, 2012No. 11-CV-6337(ADS)(GRB)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This case arises from a commercial dispute between Dorset Industries, Inc. (“Dorset” or “the Plaintiff’) and Unified Grocers, Inc. (“Unified” or “the Defendant”). Presently before the Court is a motion by the Defendant to dismiss the complaint in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are drawn from the complaint and the documents incorporated by reference in…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Big Vision Private Ltd. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Alta Vista Properties, LLC v. Mauer Vision Center, PcSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- In re TD Bank, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Szulik v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Alta Vista Properties, LLC v. Mauer Vision Center, PCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.