Carr Investments, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Carr Investments, Inc. and Edward Carr seek review of an order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reversing, as an abuse of discretion, an administrative law judge’s decision to award them attorney’s fees and costs. Because we find that the Commission’s decision was not the product of reasoned decisionmaking, we vacate its order and remand for further consideration consistent with this opinion.
I
Background
A. The Relevant Facts
In January 1992, Richard Davis opened a futures and options trading account with Carr Investments, Inc. (“CII”), a commodity…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robert D. Morris v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Stotler and Company S. Bruce Pattison Stephen Greenfield, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Zickie Z. Maloley v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc. Robert Gottsch Clifford Spencer Roberts and Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 26,692, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3386, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5538 Monex International, Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Barry WeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baystate Alternative Staffing, Inc. v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Andrews v. Blick Art Materials, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- (PC) Smith v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PS) Alston v. LLoydDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PS) Lull v. County of PlacerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.