Legal Opinion

Hammann v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The claimant is the widow of Frank Brunner, who was *573killed in the course of his employment. The facts essential to recovery are not in dispute and all exist. The only question involved is the basis for computation of the award.

The amount of the widow’s recovery is fixed by statute at four times the average annual wage of the deceased. A statute prescribes how, under different contingencies, the average annual wage shall be computed. It reads as follows :

‘T02.ll Earnings, method of computation. (1) The average weekly earnings shall be one-fiftieth of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richardson v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Struck & Irwin Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Crane v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Highway Trailer Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API